Islamic Epistemology and Modern Philosophy of Science: Seyyed Hossein Nasr’s Perspective on Contemporary Scientific Paradigms
Main Article Content
Abstract
Contemporary discourse on the relationship between religion and science has reached an unprecedented level of sophistication, yet the distinctively Islamic contribution to epistemological theory has received insufficient attention in mainstream philosophy of science literature. This study addresses that gap by conducting a systematic interdisciplinary analysis of Seyyed Hossein Nasr’s Islamic epistemological framework and its critique of modern scientific paradigms. Nasr Iranian-American philosopher, Professor Emeritus of Islamic Studies at George Washington University, and recipient of numerous international honours including the Templeton Prize nomination has spent six decades developing the most comprehensive contemporary engagement between Islamic intellectual tradition and modern Western philosophy of science. Drawing on Nasr’s major works (1989, 1993, 1996, 2006, 2010, 2016) and a systematic literature review of 60 classical and contemporary sources, this study analyses Nasr’s threefold epistemological framework revelation (wahy), reason (ʿaql), and intuition (kashf/dhawq) against four modern scientific paradigms: Comtean positivism, Popperian critical rationalism, Kuhnian paradigm theory, and postmodern epistemology. The comparative analysis across eight dimensions reveals that Nasr’s framework shares significant common ground with Kuhn’s recognition of the paradigm-dependency of scientific knowledge and with postmodern epistemology’s critique of scientism, while diverging fundamentally from all modern paradigms in its insistence on revelation as the highest epistemological authority and its integration of kashf as a legitimate source of knowledge. Five areas of productive dialogue are identified: the critique of positivist scientism, the social embeddedness of knowledge, the legitimacy of multiple epistemological frameworks, environmental ethics, and the limits of reductionist methodology. The study proposes a model of Complementary Epistemological Engagement (CEE) as a framework for dialogue between Islamic and modern scientific epistemologies that neither subordinates the former to the latter nor retreats into mutual isolation.
Keywords: Seyyed Hossein Nasr; Islamic epistemology; philosophy of science; sacred science; perennial philosophy; Kuhn; positivism; tawhid; wahy; kashf; science-religion dialogue
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abidin, Z. (2019). Epistemologi Islam dalam perspektif kontemporer: Relevansi pemikiran Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Jurnal Filsafat Islam, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14421/jfi.2019.91.1-20
Barbour, I. G. (2000). When science meets religion: Enemies, strangers, or partners? HarperCollins.
Bergson, H. (1907). L'évolution créatrice [Creative evolution] (A. Mitchell, Trans.). Macmillan. (Original work published 1907)
Chittick, W. C. (2007). Science of the cosmos, science of the soul: The pertinence of Islamic cosmology in the modern world. Oneworld Publications.
Comte, A. (1848). A general view of positivism (J. H. Bridges, Trans.). Trubner and Co. (Original work published 1848)
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1966)
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960)
Golshani, M. (2000). Does science offer evidence of a transcendent reality and purpose? Isopedia: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 25(4), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801800679472
Hanna, F. J., & Green, A. (2004). Asian shades of spirituality: Implications for multicultural school counseling. Professional School Counseling, 7(5), 326–333.
Hoodbhoy, P. (1991). Islam and science: Religious orthodoxy and the battle for rationality. Zed Books.
Ibn Khaldun. (1967). The Muqaddimah: An introduction to history (F. Rosenthal, Trans., abr. ed.). Princeton University Press. (Original work completed 1377)
Iqbal, M. (1934). The reconstruction of religious thought in Islam. Oxford University Press.
Iqbal, M. (2007). Islam and science. Ashgate Publishing.
Kalin, I. (2002). Three views of science in the Islamic world. In T. Peters, M. Iqbal, & S. N. Haq (Eds.), God, life, and the cosmos: Christian and Islamic perspectives (pp. 43–76). Ashgate.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
Mahdi, M. (2001). Alfarabi and the foundation of Islamic political philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Nasr, S. H. (1989). Knowledge and the sacred. State University of New York Press.
Nasr, S. H. (1993). The need for a sacred science. State University of New York Press.
Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the order of nature. Oxford University Press.
Nasr, S. H. (2006). Islamic philosophy from its origin to the present: Philosophy in the land of prophecy. State University of New York Press.
Nasr, S. H. (2007). The heart of Islam: Enduring values for humanity. HarperOne.
Nasr, S. H. (2010). In search of the sacred: A conversation with Seyyed Hossein Nasr on his life and thought (R. E. Jahanbegloo, Ed.). Praeger.
Nasr, S. H. (2016). Islamic life and thought. Routledge. (Original work published 1981)
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery (K. R. Popper, Trans.). Hutchinson. (Original work published 1934 as Logik der Forschung)
Seyyed Hossein Nasr Foundation. (2023). Bibliography of Seyyed Hossein Nasr. https://www.nasrfoundation.org
Stenberg, L. (1996). The Islamization of science: Four Muslim positions developing an Islamic modernity. Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Zarkasyi, H. F. (2012). Meneropong konsep epistemologi Islam [Examining the concept of Islamic epistemology]. Tsaqafah: Jurnal Peradaban Islam, 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v8i1.31