Discipline Management and Professional Attitude Formation Among Sea Transportation Cadets: Evidence from STIP Jakarta
Main Article Content
Abstract
Discipline management constitutes one of the foundational pillars of maritime cadet education, operating at the intersection of institutional governance, professional socialization, and the formation of the behavioral and attitudinal standards expected of seafaring officers. Yet empirical studies examining how discipline management systems are perceived, experienced, and internalized by cadets across differentiated training tracks—and how these perceptions relate to professional attitude formation outcomes—remain sparse in the Indonesian maritime education literature. This study investigates discipline management practices and professional attitude formation among sea transportation cadets at Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran (STIP) Jakarta, drawing on data from thirty cadets—fifteen from the deck nautical program and fifteen from the engine technics program—alongside five practitioner-lecturers comprising three maritime captains and two master mariners. Employing a qualitative descriptive design with thematic analysis, cross-group comparison, and narrative synthesis, the study maps the perceptual landscape of discipline management across cadet tracks and practitioner perspectives. Findings reveal that while cadets broadly affirm the necessity of discipline management, significant divergences exist between tracks in the perceived fairness, consistency, and formation effectiveness of current institutional discipline systems. Practitioner-lecturers identify structural inconsistencies in rule enforcement and a gap between formal disciplinary procedures and the cultivation of internalized professional attitudes as the most consequential institutional management challenges. The study contributes an attitudinal mapping framework for maritime cadet discipline management and offers practical recommendations for institutional policy reform at STIP Jakarta.
Keywords : discipline management; professional attitude; maritime cadet; formation; STIP Jakarta
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Adnan, N., Abdullah, S. N. H. S., Yusof, R. J. R., Zainal, N. F. A., Qamar, F., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). A systematic literature review in robotics experiential learning with computational and adversarial thinking. IEEE Access, 11, 21862–21884. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3249761
Ahmad, N. A., Drus, S. M., & Kasim, H. (2020). Factors that influence the adoption of enterprise architecture by public sector organizations: An empirical study. IEEE Access, 8, 113162–113181. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2996584
Beadle, E. S., Walecka, A., Sangam, A. V., Moorhouse, J. A., Winter, M., Munro, H., Trivedi, D., & Casarin, A. (2024). Triggers and factors associated with moral distress and moral injury in health and social care workers: A systematic review of qualitative studies. PLoS ONE, 19(5), e0303013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303013
Husain, O., Salim, N., Alias, R. A., Abdelsalam, S., Ramayah, T., Shehzad, H. M. F., & Hamzah, M. (2021). Modeling academic research collaborator selection using an integrated model. IEEE Access, 9, 94216–94235. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3096250
Kim, S.-K., Choi, S., & Kim, C. (2021). The framework for measuring port resilience in Korean port case. Sustainability, 13(21), 11883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111883
Paridaens, H., & Notteboom, T. (2021). National integrated maritime policies (IMP): Vision formulation, regional embeddedness, and institutional attributes for effective policy integration. Sustainability, 13(17), 9557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179557
Sabri, S., Gani, A., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Eke, C. I., & Shuib, L. (2022). A survey on mobile learning for adult learners: State-of-the-art, taxonomy, and challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 85606–85631. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3195285
Shi, Y., Ramayah, T., Hongmei, L., Zhang, Y., & Wang, W. (2023). Analysing the current status, hotspots, and future trends of technology management: Using the WoS and Scopus database. Heliyon, 9(9), e19922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19922
Widnall, E., Dodd, S., Russell, A. E., Curtin, E., Simmonds, R., Limmer, M., & Kidger, J. (2024). Mechanisms of school-based peer education interventions to improve young people's health literacy or health behaviours: A realist-informed systematic review. PLoS ONE, 19(4), e0302431. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302431
Yuebo, L., Halili, S. H., & Razak, R. A. (2024). Online learning success model for adults in open and distance education in Western China. PLoS ONE, 19(1), e0297515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297515
Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, W. (2022). Risk scenario evaluation for intelligent ships by mapping hierarchical holographic modeling into risk filtering, ranking and management. Sustainability, 14(4), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042103