Decentralization, Institutional Capacity, and Waste Governance: A Comparative Study of Medan and Binjai, North Sumatra

Main Article Content

Hatta Ridho
Muhammad Husni Thamrin
Muhammad Arif Nasution
Muhammad Azhar Nasution
Mujahid Widian Saragih
Gusti Pirandy
Jaenal Abidin
Randa Putra Kasea Sinaga
Mia Aulina Lubis

Abstract





Decentralization under Indonesian Law No. 23/2014 transferred solid waste management authority to municipal governments, yet the translation of this mandate into effective governance outcomes has been uneven across urban settings of different scales and capacities. This study examines how institutional capacity, resource allocation, and governance arrangements shape waste management outcomes in two adjacent North Sumatran cities: Medan, the provincial capital and third-largest city in Indonesia, and Binjai, a secondary municipality of approximately 300,000 residents. Through a comparative case study design, the research draws on in-depth interviews with 28 informants, document analysis of regional waste management plans and budget allocations, and secondary data from the National Waste Management Information System (SIPSN). Findings reveal that while both cities have expanded formal collection coverage over the 2019–2023 period, substantial disparities persist in collection rates, infrastructure quality, and private sector integration. Medan demonstrates greater structural capacity but faces coordination fragmentation across its 21 sub-districts; Binjai exhibits stronger inter-agency coherence but is constrained by limited budgetary resources and landfill capacity. The study identifies three institutional mechanisms that mediate the decentralization–outcome relationship: budget adequacy, inter-agency coordination, and community-based waste governance integration. Theoretical contributions to the decentralization and urban governance literature are discussed, alongside practical recommendations for strengthening waste governance in secondary cities of the Global South.


 


Keywords: decentralization; waste governance; institutional capacity; Medan; Binjai; North Sumatra; secondary cities; Indonesia





Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Decentralization, Institutional Capacity, and Waste Governance: A Comparative Study of Medan and Binjai, North Sumatra. (2026). International Journal of Economics Management and Social Science , 9(1), 567-577. https://journal.salewangang.net/ijemss/article/view/127

References

Agustina, I. H., Bowers, G., & Malkawi, F. (2021). Scaling up solid waste management in Indonesia: The role of governance, finance, and institutional capacity. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168, 105–119.

Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford University Press.

Aprilia, A., Tezuka, T., & Spaargaren, G. (2013). Inorganic and hazardous solid waste management: Current status and challenges for Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 640–647.

Badan Pusat Statistik Sumatera Utara. (2023). Sumatera Utara Dalam Angka 2023. BPS Provinsi Sumatera Utara.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Faguet, J.-P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13.

Hadiz, V. R. (2020). Localising power in post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia perspective. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(4), 558–577.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2023). Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Sampah Nasional (SIPSN) 2023. KLHK.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 81 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga dan Sampah Sejenis Sampah Rumah Tangga.

Prasojo, E., & Kurniawan, T. (2021). Toward good local governance: Local government reform in Indonesia. Springer.

Roberts, B. H. (2014). Managing Systems of Secondary Cities: Policy Responses in International Development. Cities Alliance.

Rondinelli, D. A. (1981). Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47(2), 133–145.

Smoke, P. (2019). Decentralization in Asia and the Pacific: Trends and developments. Asian Development Bank Working Paper.

Thamrin, M. H., Nasution, M. A., & Ridho, H. (2022). Bank sampah dan kesadaran lingkungan warga kota Medan: Kajian sosial-ekologis. Jurnal Sosiologi Universitas Sumatera Utara, 8(1), 45–61.

Tonkēns, E. (2022). Secondary cities in the Global South: Governance challenges and adaptive strategies. Urban Studies, 59(4), 723–741.

Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2008 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah.

Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Modak, P., Soos, R., Carbajal, A., Velis, C., Iyer, M., & Simonett, O. (2021). Global Waste Management Outlook. United Nations Environment Programme.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.