The Impact of Organizational Justice, Compensation Satisfaction, and Interpersonal Relationships on Team Performance at PT Permata Indah Rubaru
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of organizational justice, salary satisfaction, and interpersonal relationships on team performance at PT. Permata Indah Rubaru in Sumenep Regency. The research employed a quantitative approach using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis through SmartPLS 3.0 software. The sample consisted of 170 respondents selected using a purposive sampling method. The results indicate that all three independent variables have a positive and significant effect on team performance, with salary satisfaction emerging as the most dominant factor. The coefficient of determination (R²) value of 0.674 indicates that 67.4% of the variation in team performance is explained by organizational justice, salary satisfaction, and interpersonal relationships, while the remaining 32.6% is influenced by other factors outside the research model. These findings highlight the importance of implementing organizational justice, providing fair compensation, and fostering harmonious interpersonal relationships to enhance team effectiveness and productivity within the company.
Keywords:Organizational Justice; Salary Satisfaction; Interpersonal Relationships; Team Performance.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Aqilah HN, Junaidi RP, Ishaq M, Ismail I. Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Meningkatkan Kerjasama Tim. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi. 2024;2(1):135–45.
Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter CO, Ng KY. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(3):425–45.
Colquitt JA. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(3):386–400.
Creswell A. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Vol. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2014.
Ghozali I. Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep Dan Aplikasi dengan Program AMOS 24. Update Bayesian SEM. Edisi 7. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. 2017.
Greenberg J. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J Manage. 1990;16(2):399–432.
Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2020.
Isyandi B, Taufiq A, Saputra T, Prihati. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Rumah Sakit Mata PBEC. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis. 2022;19(2):172–9.
Katzenbach JR, Smith DK. The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business Review Press; 2003.
Kurdi, M., & HRA, C. (2023). Teori dasar manajemen. Dasar manajemen dalam organisasi, 1.
Lewaherilla, N. C., Wardhana, A., Kurdi, M., Rismanty, V. A., Kurniawati, D., Sari, E. J., ... & Fahmi, A. (2021). MSDM (Kunci Keberhasilan Organisasi). Media Sains Indonesia.
Milkovich GT, Newman JM. Compensation. 11th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.
Purnami NMI, Utama IWM. Pengaruh pemberdayaan, motivasi dan lingkungan kerja terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan. E-Jurnal Manajemen. 2019;8(9):5611–31.
Robbins SP, Judge TA. Organizational Behavior. 17th ed. Pearson; 2017.
Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF. PLS-SEM: Looking Back and Moving Forward. Long Range Plann. 2017;50(1):1–6.
Siregar ZME, Syahputra R, Nasution SL. Pengaruh Keadilan Organisasional Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Dengan Mediasi Kepuasan Kerja. JSHP: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan . 2020 Jul;4(2):82–92.
Tjosvold D. The conflict-positive organization: it depends upon us. J Organ Behav. 2008;29(1):19–28.