How Does Freeman's Stakeholder Theory Explain the Influence ofSustainable Finance Policy on Firm Value in the Era of ESG Investing?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines how Freeman's Stakeholder Theory provides an explanatory framework for understanding the relationship between sustainable finance policy and firm value in the contemporary era of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing. As capital markets increasingly integrate sustainability criteria into investment and lending decisions, corporations face mounting stakeholder pressure to adopt sustainable finance policies — encompassing ESG disclosure frameworks, green bond issuance, sustainability-linked financing, and carbon risk management. Drawing on a systematic literature review of scholarly and practitioner sources published between 2018 and 2025, this study argues that Stakeholder Theory offers a superior explanatory lens compared to shareholder primacy models because it accounts for the multi-directional value creation dynamics that characterise modern ESG capital markets. The analysis demonstrates that sustainable finance policies create firm value through five interrelated stakeholder channels: (1) reduced cost of capital from investor ESG alignment; (2) improved credit terms from sustainability-responsive creditors; (3) enhanced human capital productivity through employee engagement with purpose-driven organisations; (4) brand premium and customer loyalty from socially conscious consumers; and (5) regulatory first-mover advantages from proactive governance engagement. The article also identifies the conditions under which sustainable finance policies may fail to create — or may even destroy — firm value, particularly in the presence of greenwashing, governance decoupling, and stakeholder salience mismanagement. The findings carry significant theoretical and practical implications for corporate financial strategy, capital market regulation, and sustainable development policy in emerging and developed economies alike.
Keywords: Freeman's Stakeholder Theory, sustainable finance, ESG investing, firm value, green bonds, sustainability-linked loans, corporate governance, cost of capital
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Bloomberg Intelligence. (2023). ESG Assets May Hit $53 Trillion by 2025, a Third of Global AUM. Bloomberg Professional Services.
Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2021). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147-175.
Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2022). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 64(1), 64-87.
Dimson, E., Karakas, O., & Li, X. (2021). Active ownership. Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225-3268.
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693-714.
Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106-116.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2019). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
Edmans, A. (2020). Grow the Pie: How Great Companies Deliver Both Purpose and Profit. Cambridge University Press.
Ehlers, T., & Packer, F. (2019). Green bond finance and certification. BIS Quarterly Review, September, 89-104.
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.
Fink, L. (2022). Larry Fink's 2022 Letter to CEOs: The Power of Capitalism. BlackRock, Inc.
Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499-516.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2021). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2022). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 32-33.
Harrison, J. S., Barney, J. B., Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2020). The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Henisz, W., Koller, T., & Nuttall, R. (2019). Five ways that ESG creates value. McKinsey Quarterly, November.
IESR. (2022). Indonesia Energy Transition Outlook 2022. Institute for Essential Services Reform.
KPMG. (2022). Big Shifts, Small Steps: Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022. KPMG International.
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
Marquis, C., Toffel, M. W., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483-504.
MSCI. (2023). MSCI ESG Ratings: Methodology. MSCI ESG Research LLC.
OJK. (2021). Roadmap Keuangan Berkelanjutan Indonesia Tahap II 2021–2025. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2020). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403-445.
Pastor, L., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021). Sustainable investing in equilibrium. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 550-571.
Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572-597.
Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2020). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2018). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2018). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
Wahyuni, D., Harymawan, I., & Cahaya, F. R. (2021). Sustainability reporting and firm performance in Indonesia: The moderating role of board characteristics. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 219-234.
Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking and Finance, 98, 39-60.