Digital Leadership Competencies for Deck Officers: A Curriculum Development Framework for Indonesian Maritime Academies in Industry 4.0 Contexts
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The global maritime industry undergoes rapid technological transformation, yet maritime education curricula remain disconnected from industry 4.0 requirements. This qualitative study examines digital leadership competencies required by contemporary shipping operations and investigates how Indonesian maritime academies can systematically integrate these competencies into deck officer training programs. Through thematic analysis of interviews with 35 maritime experts (shipping company commanders, port authority managers, and maritime educators), this research identifies critical digital leadership competencies spanning technical literacy, meta-competencies for technological adaptation, and transformational competencies for organizational change leadership. Results reveal significant gaps between current maritime education offerings and industry expectations, particularly regarding decision-making under algorithmic uncertainty, cybersecurity awareness, and data-driven command authority. A proposed pedagogical framework integrates digital leadership competencies into existing curricula while maintaining maritime safety standards and classical seamanship foundations. Findings demonstrate that effective digital leadership development requires interdisciplinary curriculum redesign, faculty professional development initiatives, and industry-academic partnership models. This research provides evidence-based recommendations for maritime educators, institutional leadership, and industry stakeholders regarding optimal strategies for competency assessment, curriculum design, and continuous professional development pathways for maritime officers transitioning into digitally-intensive shipping environments.
Keywords : Maritime leadership; Digital transformation; Curriculum development; Competency framework; Maritime education; Industry 4.0; Deck officer training
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Bilal, A., Xiao-ping, L., Nanli, Z., Sharma, R., & Jahanger, A. (2021). Green technology innovation, globalization, and CO2 emissions: Recent insights from the OBOR economies. Sustainability, 14(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010236
Buddha, H., Shuib, L., Idris, N., & Eke, C. I. (2024). Technology-assisted language learning systems: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 12, 27645–27668. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3366663
Caldas, P., Pedro, M. I., & Marques, R. C. (2024). An assessment of container seaport efficiency determinants. Sustainability, 16(11), 4427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114427
Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J. A., Pinho, T., & Rodrigues, R. (2024). Fuzzy-set QCA on performance and sustainability determinants of ports supporting floating offshore wind farms. Sustainability, 16(7), 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072947
Chae, G.-Y., An, S.-H., & Lee, C.-Y. (2021). Demand forecasting for liquified natural gas bunkering by country and region using meta-analysis and artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 13(16), 9058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169058
Du, S., Zhang, H. S., & Kong, Y. (2023). Sustainability implications of the Arctic shipping route for Shanghai port logistics in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability, 15(22), 16017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216017
Kim, B., Kim, G., & Kang, M.-H. (2022). Study on comparing the performance of fully automated container terminals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(15), 9415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159415
Liao, Y.-H., & Lee, H.-S. (2023). Using a directional distance function to measure the environmental efficiency of international liner shipping companies and assess regulatory impact. Sustainability, 15(4), 3821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043821
Mwendapole, M. J., & Jin, Z. (2021). Evaluation of seaport service quality in Tanzania: From the Dar es Salaam seaport perspective. Sustainability, 13(18), 10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810076
Paridaens, H., & Notteboom, T. (2021). National integrated maritime policies (IMP): Vision formulation, regional embeddedness, and institutional attributes for effective policy integration. Sustainability, 13(17), 9557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179557
Pian, F., Xu, L., Chen, Y., & Lee, S.-H. (2020). Global emission taxes and port privatization policies under international competition. Sustainability, 12(16), 6595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166595
Qi, J., Wang, S., & Zheng, J. (2022). Shore power deployment problem—A case study of a Chinese container shipping network. Sustainability, 14(11), 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116928
Sabri, S., Gani, A., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Eke, C. I., & Shuib, L. (2022). A survey on mobile learning for adult learners: State-of-the-art, taxonomy, and challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 85606–85631. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3195285
Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, W. (2022). Risk scenario evaluation for intelligent ships by mapping hierarchical holographic modeling into risk filtering, ranking and management. Sustainability, 14(4), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042103
Zhou, K., Yuan, X., Guo, Z., Wu, J., & Li, R. (2024). Research on sustainable port: Evaluation of green port policies on China's coasts. Sustainability, 16(10), 4017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104017